How I love my subscribers. Recently Diane Ward sent me an article on "The New Austerity in publishing" from The New York Times. I thought I'd share reporter Motoko Rich's rundown with you and then let you know how I feel about it. Ready?
Rich says the publishing world's "cushy, schmooze fest seems to be winding down." Before you can appreciate these austerity cuts you have to know that last year Macmillan brought its entire sales and marketing staff from New York to Hotel del Coronado in San Diego. Further the partying included spa treatments and wine tastings. If you have never been to that hotel, I need to tell you that it is ultra plush. The new austerity program includes:
~For Macmillan in 2009, no Hotel del Coronado. A Webcam meeting instead for two of its meetings and only one in-person meeting is on the docket. The article didn't say where that one shindig might take place.
~Salary freezes or layoffs or both for HarperCollins, Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, Penguin Group, Random House, Simon & Schuster.
~Simon & Schuster canceled its usual cushy holiday party.
~Random House substituted a cafeteria pizza lunch for its usual plush cocktail party.
~Across the board editors are being asked to scale back on their two-martini lunch meetings.
~Random House will not be returning to Bermuda for a conference in 2009.
The article states all the reasons the publishing is in trouble other than the current economic downtrend. It also talks about the old days in publishing when executives considered the use of a towncar a luxury.
So, what were these publishers thinking when they were throwing these kinds of parties? I know. You're thinking, well, she's the Frugal Girl. Naturally she'd hate this.
Well, I wouldn't mind a good spa treatment and I might accept one if offered except that I've seen too many emerging authors disappear and despair because these same houses have been downright cheap with promotion budgets for any but their top grossing authors.
I've seen poor, unsuspecting authors assigned editors who can barely proofread.
I've seen authors asked to provide their own booktour funds and do their own or hire out their own indexing.
I've seen editors move from publishing house to publishing house because of what? They couldn't be moving because they are being paid well or because the working conditions are second-to-none!
I've seen fewer and fewer new poets and literary authors published since I've been watching. And catalogs grow sparser. And midlist authors get neglected.
According to Rich, this is an industry that Bennett Cerf was once supposed to have said was "never meant to support limousines" when they have to absorb book returns and should be fostering new talent. So what were these executives thinking?
I'll tell you what. The same thing executives of the now defunct AIG and Lehman Brothers were thinking. It was about immediate profits rather than long term products and greed rather than concern for their own people and their own industry.
It may be too late to tell these giants to watch their backs. I wish them well. I'd like to have a book published by them in spite of all these tales of gluttony, both real and metaphorical. That may be because I was raised up revering these names and words like "literature."
Nevertheless, it's a new world out there. We have new printing technology and entrepreneurial authors (some of who were made that way by the very stinginess of these publishing houses). We have the Web that offers niche opportunities and marketing methods never dreamed of two decades ago. And we have authors interested in giving other authors a hand, in writing and giving of themselves unselfishly (evidenced by my newsletter and this blog in which other authors write and contribute articles selflessly).
It's about the time the big publishing houses got it. If they get frugal and go back to their roots, this will all be for the best. If not, authors will just keep writing--and publishing--without them.
Technorati Tags:
lehman brothers, aig, new york times, motoko rich, carolyn howard-johnson, bennett cerf, new york publishers. living the high life, midlist authors,
-----
Carolyn Howard-Johnson, author of This Is the Place; Harkening: A Collection of Stories Remembered; Tracings, a chapbook of poetry; and two how to books, The Frugal Book Promoter: How To Do What Your Publisher Won't and The Frugal Editor: Put Your Best Book Forward to Avoid Humiliation and Ensure Success. She is also the author of the Amazon Short, "The Great First Impression Book Proposal". Some of her other blogs are TheNewBookReview.blogspot.com, a blog where authors can recycle their favorite reviews. She also blogs at all things editing, grammar, formatting and more at The Frugal, Smart and Tuned-In Editor blog.
Pages
About SharingwithWriters Blog
Friday, January 23, 2009
8 comments:
Thank you for commenting on posts at #SharingwithWriters blog, a Writers Digest 101 Best Websites pick at
www.SharingWithWriters.blogspot.com. You might also find www.TheFrugalEditor.blogspot.com full of resources you can use and
www.TheNewBookReview.blogspot.com, a free review site will benefit your book or increase your reading pleasure.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Amen! You nailed it.
ReplyDeleteAll I can say is Amen! Yes, obviously those executives were thinking the same thing as the mortgage company executives. The bigger a company becomes, the less sense it's expenses and spending make to everyone else.
ReplyDeleteI won't go into my tirade about the big boys only seeking best sellers from 'celebrities' or buying their place on the New York Times bestseller list or the lack of support for midlist authors...
I'll just think it!
L. Diane Wolfe
www.circleoffriendsbooks.blogspot.com
www.spunkonastick.net
www.thecircleoffriends.net
Don't get me started, Carolyn. I've never understood why publishers go to the trouble and expense of printing and distributing books without first making sure that manuscripts are well-edited and then putting the necessary money into marketing. (My publisher's editor, I'm embarrassed to say, allowed my book to go to press with 7 typos--undetected until the book was translated word by word into Chinese.) It's a crazy business model. Savvy authors, as you well know, don't rely on their publishers to edit or promote their work. They either do it themselves or hire people to do it for them.
ReplyDeleteAs you say, it's a whole new world out there. My guess is that traditional publishers, like record producers, will be increasingly irrelevant in the digital age.
Prill Boyle
Author of Defying Gravity
www.prillboyle.com
Excellent, excellent summary and opinion, Carolyn. Greatly appreciate your thoughts and deem them spot-on. If I get to my own blogging within the next day or two, may I reference this post?
ReplyDeleteAs always, enjoy your day!
- Jason M. Waltz
Great post, Carolyn!
ReplyDeleteAllyn Evans
Please see von Darkmoor's additions to this post at http://www.jasonmwaltz.com/thoughts/2009/01/25/publishing-in-2009-an-oxymoron/. Seem's NY Times' Rich started something. (-:
ReplyDeleteCarolyn
Dear Carolyn,
ReplyDeleteAs one who has met several authors, published and aspiring, since I embarked on my own trek, I'd like to share a few more thoughts from my experience.
The first is how surprising it was to be approached by people who hastily (my opinion) self-published books and then wondered what they should do next. They weren't interested in comments about their "baby," only how to increase sales. The self-publishers who prey on these people make all sorts of promises that never seem to materialize after the book is in hand. These authors never get to answer the hard questions such as, "What books do you consider competitors for your work?" "Is your book good enough to compete with said competition?" "How did you determine that?" "How big is the market for your book?" "How many people in your target group buy books?" "How do you reach them?" "How much time and money can you budget for marketing?" Well, you get the idea. Once the investment is made, it's too late to go back and do it over.
As one who had a few high-level marketing jobs in industry, I know that if the competition, market size, etc. is known beforehand, it actually influences the final product. Off-hand, writers will say that they were going to write what they were going to write regardless. But, is this really true? I don't think so. Publishers are always looking for topics they think the market will readily accept and many books can be tailored to those markets-without compromising the quality and artistry involved.
The second, and most damaging, conclusion from my experience in counseling writers is that the majority don't really want to hear that their work is lacking commercial quality. They would rather lament how the publishing world is going to hell and how they can't get recognized. My take on this turn of events is, if I could name one thing that is hurting writers, it's the amount of total crap there is out there. As mentioned recently in the NY Times, there were 480,000 titles published last year. And that's probably a low figure. The book editor at the Cleveland Plain Dealer told me that they get 350 unsolicited books for review EACH WEEK! Wonder why the little guy can't get a review?
I don't know that there is an easy answer to this dilemma but people should go into it with their eyes wide open. They say that pessimists are never disappointed.
Regards,
Raff Ellis, Author
Kisses from a Distance
www.raffellis.com
www.youtube.com/watch?v=ohsvMi-VCjI
Dear Carolyn,
ReplyDeleteAs one who has met several authors, published and aspiring, since I embarked on my own trek, I'd like to share a few more thoughts from my experience.
The first is how surprising it was to be approached by people who hastily (my opinion) self-published books and then wondered what they should do next. They weren't interested in comments about their "baby," only how to increase sales. The self-publishers who prey on these people make all sorts of promises that never seem to materialize after the book is in hand. These authors never get to answer the hard questions such as, "What books do you consider competitors for your work?" "Is your book good enough to compete with said competition?" "How did you determine that?" "How big is the market for your book?" "How many people in your target group buy books?" "How do you reach them?" "How much time and money can you budget for marketing?" Well, you get the idea. Once the investment is made, it's too late to go back and do it over.
As one who had a few high-level marketing jobs in industry, I know that if the competition, market size, etc. is known beforehand, it actually influences the final product. Off-hand, writers will say that they were going to write what they were going to write regardless. But, is this really true? I don't think so. Publishers are always looking for topics they think the market will readily accept and many books can be tailored to those markets-without compromising the quality and artistry involved.
The second, and most damaging, conclusion from my experience in counseling writers is that the majority don't really want to hear that their work is lacking commercial quality. They would rather lament how the publishing world is going to hell and how they can't get recognized. My take on this turn of events is, if I could name one thing that is hurting writers, it's the amount of total crap there is out there. As mentioned recently in the NY Times, there were 480,000 titles published last year. And that's probably a low figure. The book editor at the Cleveland Plain Dealer told me that they get 350 unsolicited books for review EACH WEEK! Wonder why the little guy can't get a review?
I don't know that there is an easy answer to this dilemma but people should go into it with their eyes wide open. They say that pessimists are never disappointed.
Regards,
Raff Ellis, Author
Kisses from a Distance
www.raffellis.com
www.youtube.com/watch?v=ohsvMi-VCjI